“However truly, the artwork that he produced was memorable in our modern tradition.
“So I feel there’s a dialogue available definitely, and one which should maintain these items in stability with out condoning in any approach the [offensive] views.”
Requested if Dahl’s anti-Semitic views interfered in his portrayal of the author, Bonneville defined that he struck a ‘stability’.
He mentioned: “You must maintain in stability the work somebody creates and the character.
“You despise the views of the individual however the work that they produce perhaps of the best type of artwork or no less than widespread type of artwork.
“One decries, after all, the views that he [Dahl] expressed and the household have latterly marked out their disapproval as nicely, however you’ll be able to’t carry that right into a efficiency as a result of it is not related to this specific efficiency.
“The article in query wherein he wrote these views have been a long time later I consider.
“It wasn’t certainly a chapter of his life that I knew about till it got here up final yr if I am actually sincere.”
In December final yr Dahl’s household issued an apology for the late storyteller’s offensive feedback about Jewish individuals.
Hollywood mogul Weinstein, 68, was revealed as a intercourse predator because of the Me Too motion, having produced among the movie trade’s largest blockbusters throughout his profession.